Wi-FiGurus

The community of Wi-Fi Professionals

Top Referrer

Gino

Most Profilic Writer

jonassono

Newsletter Subscription
Name:
Email:
Format:
Select:
List:
Most Popular
Latest Content
Tag Cloud
access point configuration hotel India interference InterOp maintainence market multicast Public Wi-Fi reengineering sales security services spectrum analyzer Users Vo-WiFi VoWIP WLAN capacity
Quick Tips
Beacon rates may impact signal coverage measurements PDF Print E-mail
(4 votes)
Written by Jim Geier   
Saturday, 08 December 2007

When using survey tools, such as AirMagnet Survey and Ekahau, to measure signal strength for generating signal coverage maps, be certain to take into account the 802.11 beacon intervals set in the access points or mesh nodes. The default beacon interval is generally 100 milliseconds, and the default setting for most survey tools is to measure signal strength on each RF channel for 250 milliseconds (sometimes called the “scan time”). With these settings, you’re assured of the access points or mesh nodes transmitting a beacon while the survey tool is measuring the signals on a particular channel. In fact, at least two beacons will occur during that time, so the survey tool won’t miss any of the beacons. A possible problem may occur, however, if the beacon interval on the access points or mesh nodes is set to a shorter value. For example, Tropos mesh nodes generally have default beacon intervals of 250 milliseconds. They do this to reduce overhead traffic (i.e., beacons) on the network. In this case, if your survey tool is set to a scan time of 250 milliseconds, then there’s a possibility that a beacon will not occur during the 250 milliseconds. At these setting, the absence of a beacon has very low probability. In fact, I’ve inadvertently used these settings before for surveying a large area, and there were very few (much less than one percent) missed beacons. I could tell this by the fact that the tool measured signal activity for nearly all sample points. I saw very few where it didn’t. Therefore, the signal coverage generated by the survey tool was still very accurate. In most cases, the scan time is adjustable. To ensure the survey tool you’re using is measuring all possible signal data, it’s a good idea, though, to be certain that the scan time of the survey tool is greater than the beacon interval.

 

 
Tips for testing muni Wi-Fi networks indoors PDF Print E-mail
(2 votes)
Written by Jim Geier   
Monday, 29 October 2007

Click to see real size
Most municipal Wi-Fi networks are designed and hopefully installed to provide signal coverage inside approximately 70 percent of residences and businesses, at least near an exterior wall of the facility. It’s possible to go without permission inside some of the businesses, such as hotel lobbies and restaurants, but how do you get inside private residences? I’m currently verifying the signal coverage of a moderately-sized municipal Wi-Fi network, and we came up with a fairly good approach: simply post an advertisement in the local newspaper asking for volunteer residents to open their doors to the test team. We got a surprisingly large number of volunteers! What we learned, though, is to limit testing to daylight hours. It’s very difficult to find the homes at night, even with a GPS. Also, be ready to answer a lot of questions from the residents. Think ahead about how you’re going to response to questions such as: How good is my signal? (I don’t recommend answering that one); When will the network be ready for use?; How will I know if I have signal coverage once it’s ready for use?

 
Multiple products now 802.11n (draft 2) certified PDF Print E-mail
(2 votes)
Written by Jim Geier   
Wednesday, 12 September 2007

802.11n is taking off as more and more vendors release products and gain Wi-Fi certification based on the 802.11n (draft 2) standard. Click here to see a current list of Wi-Fi 802.11n certified products.

 
Choosing an Optimal Access Point for Authenticating Users PDF Print E-mail
(1 vote)
Written by Jim Geier   
Thursday, 19 July 2007
In some cases, you might decide to host 802.1X port-based authentication services within an access point instead of dedicating an external RADIUS server. This may be the most cost-effective approach for smaller deployments. In order to maximize performance of the network when implementing local authentication, I’ve found that it’s beneficial to configure the authentication server in the access point that is projected to have the least amount of user traffic. The higher overhead on this access point may consume a significant amount of the access point’s capacity as wireless users throughout the network perform re-authentication.
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next > End >>

Results 1 - 6 of 45
Home
Top Content
eLearning (Login reqd.)
Quiz
Pod casts
Quick Tips
Tutorials
Columns
Wi-Fi News
WiMax News
Glossary
Book Store
Events
Links
Login
Who's Online
We have 7 guests online
Syndicate
Sponsored Links